How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary tasks?
To answer this question I have made this video where I will talk about the media products while showing them on the screen.
Friday 10 March 2017
Thursday 23 February 2017
Monday 20 February 2017
Ancillary Task 2
Research into conventions of film posters today
Today a typical film poster includes a few key features; bold film title, famous person, famous persons name in large text, ratings and a scene from the film to give a hint. The colour scheme and mood also seems quite considered to match the tone/genre, like in this piece it is very dark with deep blues and a lot of black.
Final Design
...
Final Final Design
After getting feedback from people looking at the poster I realised I needed to make some changes to the text, people though the text along the bottom had 'too nice' of a tone and needed to be more snappy and sharp, people also suggested I should include the name of the documenter as this is a big part of what makes you want to watch a documentry (thinking Louie Thereoux, David Attenbrough), when you know and like the documenter you want to watch it which is why in advertising for this sort of documentry the name of the documenter is bold and one of the first things you read and what draws you in. So with these finishing touches, hopefully this is my final design.,
Ancillary Task 1
Using Adobe Indesign I have created this elegant magazine layout show casing our short film documentry. I think the over all style and appearance successfully reflects the tone of the documentry and compliments/promotes it without try too hard. My inspiration came from analysing articals from Little White Lies and Marvel Magazines. This overlayed image really reflects Davids identity, showing a close up of him looking into the camera overlayed with him sitting in his spot waiting for this person he met in his dream. The dreamy confusing atmosphere sums it up well. I tried to make the text as engaging and interesting a possible by starting with a rhetorical question and mentioning relevent issues that are of public interest.
I continued to make subtle improvements to the article, giving it a more simple bright finish adjusting the colour pallette, making subtle changes to the layout, dates and page numbers, this touch made it clear that its part of an article and made it appear more professional. I think that the soft colour pallettre works really well as it compliments the image and picks out certain tones while look aesthetically pleasing. I also changed the title font as I wanted to give the article a more simple, bright tone.
Sunday 19 February 2017
Friday 17 February 2017
Evaluation Question 1
In what
ways does our short film use, develop or challenge conventions of real media
products?
The genre
of our short film is called a docu-film. This is because we have made a
documentary-style film, but it is not based on real life. Due to this, we tried
to stick to all the clichés of documentaries, in order to make it look as close
to reality as possible. For each sub-heading below, we have selected a picture
to help illustrate the point (view left to right, top to bottom).
Narrative
In terms of
narrative, we kept this traditional, matching the conventions of documentaries.
Naturally, documentaries explain a story through facts and so they need to be
chronological. This is what we did. Had we of strayed away from this, we would
lose sight of the documentary, it would confuse viewers. The first picture is a
screengrab from our opening narrative.
Plot
As a
general rule, documentaries tend to follow an unconventional character with an
unconventional story. This is what we tried to do. Of course, real
documentaries would work with a real person and a real story. In this sense, it
could be said that we stray away from this area of conventions. We also found
that documentaries tend to create some sort of decision for the viewer to make
e.g. is this person truly bad, or do they need help? (perhaps in the case of
crime documentaries). Our question was somewhat similar, we could state it as,
"is this person truly selfish and obsessed, or does he need help?" So
again, we follow the clichés. Picture 2 was selected as we can see the two main
characters in conversation, which we feel best sums up our film.
Settings/Locations
We didn't
create a set. We did however add to the settings we planned to use e.g. by
placing drawings on a wall in the main character's house. This would go against
documentary conventions, as documentary-makers would never manipulate the
surroundings of their subject; this would stop it being real-life and factual.
Having said this, the settings and locations of our film is true to documentary
clichés. This is because we've used real-life settings such as an average
house, and a nearby city. It is true to life. Picture 3 was chosen as it shows
just one of our locations in which we used a pan shot to illustrate.
Costume/Props
For
costume, we went for nothing too crazy. Of course, we tried to stick to real
life. This wasn't particularly difficult. We based our presenter's costume on
Louis Theroux:
Louis
Theroux goes for a smart-casual look which we attempted to match. I would say
that we achieved this and so have used conventions of documentaries (as Louis
Theroux is a leading figure in documentaries regarding controversial stories.)
We made
sure that no one in our cast stood out, the costume was not the main focus for
us. We chose picture 4 as it showed both our characters costumes which show how
everyday they are.
In terms of
props, we did not have many. This would follow the conventions of documentaries
seeing as documentaries do not try to create an artificial environment.
However, the one main prop we did have takes us away from the conventions of
documentaries as we created it (the drawings of the person he is searching for)
to enhance the character's backstory. It emphasised our character's obsession.
Camera Work
Our camera
work was probably one of the main ways we made our film look like a
documentary, we feel this is what made it fit into our desired genre. In
particular, we used shots such as tracking shots. Often in documentaries there
is time spent walking with the presenter and subject and we tried to include
this. We also tried to experiment with focus e.g. pull focus, soft focus etc.
This was to add more of an atmosphere to our film. It also puts emphasis on
different things. This again is similar to real documentaries.
We tried to
include lots of shots of miscellaneous objects in the surroundings of our
character. Documentaries tend to do this to help build up a backstory of their
character, they then include some sort of voiceover over the top. We utilised
that technique a few times in our film. Picture 5 is a screengrab from a shot
where we used pull focus. In picture 4 you can see a tracking shot also.
Editing
Our editing
has been kept quite simple. Documentaries do not require fancy editing, it
simply needs to tell the story somewhat chronologically and coherently. One
technique we used, which is used often in documentaries, is overlapping clips
with narration to link them. We used this several times. In picture 6 we have a
miscellaneous shot in the car, what tied this in with the surrounding shots and
film was the linking narration.
Special
Effects
The only
'special effects' we used was to add titles/captions such as on the interviews
where we captioned the clip with their name. Therefore we have followed
conventions. In picture 7 you can see one of the captions we made.
Casting/Characters
In terms of
the presenters, it would seem that many documentaries of this type try to cast
someone confident and assured, someone willing to ask tough questions. While
our documentary is vaguely scripted and isn't real, Jasper is quite a confident
person and so we used him. This worked well. Documentaries also tend to include
some people to back-up the severity of the story and/or people who are involved
with the person to add emotional weight. In this sense, we have the factual
side, and then the emotional side. We followed this convention with having the
'expert' and then the 'family'. We chose age appropriate people to make this
more believable.
We had
trouble casting our main character having originally envisioned him as middle
aged. We eventually decided that using a younger person might work better as
perhaps it could be said our character is naive. The actor we cast, Henry, is
older than us; in his early 20s. This worked well and feel it looks believable
- after all, mental health issues can affect anyone. This really sends that
message home.
Picture 8
shows the youngest cast member. You can see in the other pictures in the grid
that we have a range of ages.
Genre
As said
briefly earlier, we really tried to play to documentary cliches in order for it
to easily be recognised as one. We wanted no blurred lines as to what our short
film is. It might be said that if documentaries are unclear, then they have
completely missed their purpose (that being to inform). Some of the most
commonly used components of documentaries are;
interviews
flashbacks
voice-overs
arbitrary
clips of objects to do with the subject
dramatisation/reconstructions
following
the main character in the daily life
There are
of course many more. Out of those listed above, we have used 4/6. These being
the interviews, voice-overs, arbitrary clips, and following the main character.
We felt that for our subject matter, these techniques are what would work best
to break up the facts and keep it interesting. We also based the documentary on
a somewhat real-life issue, While we are not aware of anybody suffering from
our main character's obsession, it could be believed to be real-life. In other
words, it is not eccentric or obscure in that it is impossible e.g. the
character has super-powers.
We have
picked up that many documentaries will create a discussion point - almost
attempting to divide the audience up by making them think and ask questions
about the situation being presented to them e.g. in our case, is David (the
focus of the documentary) deluded and selfish for what he is doing, or does he need
help and guidance? Without a doubt, documentaries about the 'nitty-gritty' will
pick stories that have more than one perspective. This is what captures the
audience's attention. Take, for example, Channel 4 documentaries.
While it is
hard to find a shot that demonstrates genre, we decided on using the title
screen. However, it is the conventions we use that really make our film
recognisable as a documentary.
A2 Coursework Final Draft; Beyond Reality
This is the final cut of our A2 Coursework after making changes to our rout cut from information gained on our audience feedback.